Scientific References

AI Enabled Aging Reversal Resources Database

Evidence-informed. Proprietary implementation.

Scientific foundation

AgeMeter is grounded in the established scientific concept that aging can be examined through multiple functional measures rather than chronological age alone. The AgeMeter protocols, normative profiles, scoring mappings, and implementation are proprietary.

Multidimensional

Functional aging is broader than any single laboratory or performance measurement.

Repeatable

Consistent protocols support comparison of an individual’s performance over time.

Reference-based

AgeMeter results use versioned research-based normative profiles and controlled scoring.

Selected foundational literature

These publications address broad biological-age and Functional Biological Age methodology. They do not disclose AgeMeter’s proprietary biomarker selection, test protocols, normative mappings, or scoring engine.

  • Belsky DW, Caspi A, Houts R, et al. Quantification of biological aging in young adults. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2015. PubMed
  • Levine ME. Modeling the rate of senescence: can estimated biological age predict mortality more accurately than chronological age? Journals of Gerontology Series A. 2013. PubMed
  • Klemera P, Doubal S. A new approach to the concept and computation of biological age. Mechanisms of Ageing and Development. 2006. DOI